2-36 (even) Old Mill House Close. Pelsall, Walsall WS4 1BL
BIR/00CU/LDC/2025/0048 · dispensation from consultation · Walsall · decided 14 Jul 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for remedial works to remove moss, treat the roofs, clear gutters and downpipes and remove waste, while leaseholders keep their right to challenge the costs under section 27A.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Adriatic Land 11 Limited |
| Management company | Millers Green (Sheffield) Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 18 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £8,400 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property comprises of 18 flats in a purpose-built block.
- freeholder
The freehold is owned by Adriatic Land 11 Limited (incorporated in Guernsey)(OE ID: OE018212)
- outcome
The Tribunal dispenses with the with the obligation to carry out
- total demanded
The Works will cost the sum of £8,400.
- s20
The Tribunal dispenses with the with the obligation to carry out
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.