2-3 Egerton Gardens, London SW3 2BS
LON/00AW/LDC/2023/0022 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 26 Sep 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the consultation requirements for the emergency fire alarm panel and temporary fire alarm works but refused it for the waking watch, and limited the landlord's recoverable costs of the application against two objectors to half.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The application for dispensation is GRANTED IN PART without conditions.
- s20c
the Tribunal determines that not more than half of the landlord’s costs of the application may be recovered via the service charge
- s20
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation unconditionally in respect of the works from Lantern Fire & Security
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.