2-24 (Evens) Barrows Close, Walsall, WS9 9BS
BIR/00GG/LDC/2023/0001 · dispensation from consultation · Walsall · decided 19 Apr 2023
The Tribunal granted the applicant management company dispensation under section 20ZA from the full consultation requirements so that urgent repairs to the water pumps could proceed without delay.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Maple (197) Ltd |
| Managing agent | HLM Property Management |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a block of twelve modern, purpose-built self-contained flats
- freeholder
the only response to the Tribunal’s Directions was from Persimmon PLC who the Tribunal assumes are the Freeholders
- management company
Applicant : [name] (197) Ltd
- agent
Applicant’s Representative : [name] HLM Property Management
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the dispensation requested under Section 20ZA and determines accordingly.
- s20
the Tribunal grants the dispensation requested under Section 20ZA
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.