Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near MK16 9FD

2-12 Addenbrookes Road, Newport Pagnell, MK16 9FD

CAM/00MG/LDC/2026/0032 · dispensation from consultation · Milton Keynes · decided 7 Aug 2026

The tribunal dispensed with the statutory consultation requirements for the urgent replacement of two communal boilers at the block, finding no evidence the leaseholders were prejudiced.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedRTM company
Freeholder / landlordSF Ground Rents No 15 Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
six purpose built residential flats across 2 floors
freeholder
The Landlord is SF Ground Rents No 15 Limited.
outcome
to dispense with all the consultation requirements in relation to the works described in the application form and the application bundle
s20
to dispense with all the consultation requirements in relation to the works described in the application form and the application bundle, namely the replacement of two communal boilers at the property.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.