1A Brewery Road, Bromley, Kent, BR2 8BF
LON/00AF/LAC/2021/0012 · administration charges · Bromley · decided 1 Dec 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the administration charges for collecting ground rent in 2018 to 2021 not payable, and reduced the 2017 insurance claim administration charge from £1310 to £500 plus VAT.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Limited
- years
administration charges of £36 for 2018 and £39 per year for 2019, 2020 and 2021 are not payable
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the charge for this work should be reduced to £500 + VAT.
- items reduced
The Tribunal determines that the charge for this work should be reduced to £500 + VAT.
- s20c
it was just and equitable that an order be made under section 20C of the 1985 Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.