199, New Church Road Hove BN3 4ED
HAV/00ML/LSC/2025/0683 · service charges · Brighton and Hove · decided 10 Nov 2025
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the leaseholder is not liable to pay half of the insurance premium because the lease does not allow that charge, but is liable to pay half of the management fees, £82.65, and must reimburse the £114 application fee.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, management fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance |
| Total demanded | £520.28 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to reimburse application fee £114 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted in 1970 into two flats
- years
for the year 2024-2025
- outcome
the Respondent is not liable to pay 50%
- items reduced
the Respondent is not liable to pay 50%
- total demanded
the Applicant seeks an order that the Respondent is liable for payment of £520.28
- costs
the Respondent is liable to pay the Applicant the Application Fee of £114
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.