191-210 Nash House, Poynders Gardens Estate, London SW4 8PH
LON/00AY/LDC/2020/0046 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 1 May 2020
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the major works completed at Nash House in January 2018, despite admitted late and missing responses to some lessees' observations, because no lessee was shown to have suffered prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 20 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016 |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 20 flats, numbered 191-210, in one block, Nash House, 11 of which are held on long leases.
- years
the Applicant commenced a programme of major works across the 7 blocks on the estate
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the Applicant dispensation from the consultation requirements in relation to the major works
- s20
The Tribunal grants the Applicant dispensation from the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.