19 Windrush Close, Pelsall, WS3 4LJ
BIR/41UK/LAC/2020/0004 · administration charges · Walsall · decided 19 Jan 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal decided the applicant is under no liability to pay the three administration charges claimed, and in a later addendum ordered that the landlord's costs of the proceedings cannot be added to the service charge and that the applicant's liability for litigation costs is extinguished.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Wallace Partnership Reversionary Group Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent landlord in connection with these proceedings
- outcome
The Applicant is under no liability to pay any Administration Charges to the Respondent.
- items reduced
The Applicant is under no liability to pay any Administration Charges to the Respondent.
- s20c
Pursuant to section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 I order that all costs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.