19 The Stephenson, North Side, Dunston, Gateshead NE8 2BF
MAN/00CH/LBC/2019/0019 · breach of lease · Gateshead · decided 2 Apr 2020
The tribunal found that the leaseholder breached clause 19 of Schedule 4 of the lease by allowing the flat to be used for short-term lettings, which was not a private dwelling house, but found the nuisance allegations not proven; no costs order was made and parties may apply for costs within 28 days.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Staiths (Phase 1) Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Applicant : [name] (Phase 1) Management Company Limited
- agent
it’ managing agent is Brannen and Partners (“Brannen”)
- outcome
The Application is granted. The Tribunal determines pursuant to section 168(4) of the Commonhold & Leasehold Reform Act 2002 that a breach of a covenant or condition in the lease has occurred.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.