19 Oakwood Drive, Leeds, LS8 2JB
MAN/00DA/LDC/2021/0050 · dispensation from consultation · Leeds · decided 30 Jun 2022
The tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs at 19 Oakwood Drive, finding the leaseholders were not prejudiced.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Long Term Reversions (Torquay) Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Inspired Property Management |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a stone-built terrace house converted into two flats sharing a communal entrance and lobby
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] (Torquay) Ltd
- agent
Applicant’s : Inspired Property Management
- outcome
Those parts of the statutory consultation requirements relating to the works which have not been complied with are to be dispensed with.
- s20
Those parts of the statutory consultation requirements relating to the works which have not been complied with are to be dispensed with.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.