19 Lansdown House, Bournemouth, Dorset BH1 3JR
CHI/00HN/LAC/2021/0003 · administration charges · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 5 Jul 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal allowed only £1,365.00 of the administration charges claimed for breaches of the lease and licence, limiting legal costs to about £1,000, and barred the landlord from adding its costs of these proceedings to future charges beyond the amounts allowed.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Scafell Properties Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Scafell Properties Ltd.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that reasonable administration charges incurred by the Respondent
- items reduced
the legal costs incurred would have been around £1,000.00 if that had happened
- total payable
1,365.00
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.