19 Hillside Road, Bath BA2 3NU
HAV/23UC/LSC/2024/0648 · service charges · Bath and North East Somerset · decided 11 Dec 2025
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the roof and fire safety charges payable as demanded, rejecting the argument that the reserve fund should have been built up more, and made no section 20C order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Curo Places Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 11 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
They form part of a development of 11 flats at 17-32 Hillside Road Bath BA2 3NU
- freeholder
Respondents : Curo Places Limited
- years
increase the 2023/24 Reserve Fund contribution
- outcome
service charges of £1,379.20 and £6,156.08 were payable by the Applicant
- s20c
The Tribunal declines to make orders limiting the recovery of costs under s.20C LTA 1985
- s20
the Tribunal granted a dispensation order
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 29 May 2025.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.