Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near NW3 6AR

19 Frognal, Hampstead NW3 6AR

LON/00AG/LDC/2024/0027 · dispensation from consultation · Camden · decided 22 Apr 2024

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent major works to clear damp and mould in Flat 1, finding no prejudice to the tenants and making no order on fees.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentWarwick Estates
BuildingOne flat, 13 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputemajor works
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£3,575.04
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The property comprises 13 flats.
freeholder
Applicant : 19 Frognal Ltd
agent
Representative : [name] of Warwick Estates
outcome
The Tribunal grants a dispensation pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the works the subject of the application.
total demanded
in respect of major works totalling £3,575.04
s20
The Tribunal grants a dispensation pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the works the subject of the application.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.