181 Poulton Road, Wallasey, CH44 9DG
MAN/00CB/LSC/2020/0024 · service charges · Wirral · decided 9 May 2021
The tribunal found the Respondent liable for £745.33 of the 2019 service charge, having cut the insurance reinstatement cost assessment and the claimed items, and allowed £240 for administration charges.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Ground Rent Trst Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, management fees, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, management fees, other |
| Total demanded | £1,282.83 |
| Total found payable | £745.33 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the ground floor flat in a three-storey building accommodating one other flat at first and second floor level
- freeholder
Applicant : The Ground Rent Trst Limited
- years
the Tribunal is satisfied that the claim only relates to 2019
- outcome
The Respondent is liable to pay the Applicant the sum of £745.33 for the service charge payable in respect of the 2019 service charge year.
- items reduced
Insurance Reinstatement Cost Assessment £300.00
- total demanded
The Respondent’s liability @ 50% £1,282.83
- total payable
Respondent’s liability @ 50% £745.33
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.