18 Rotary Lodge, 32 St Botolph’s Road, Worthing BN11 4JT
CHI/45UH/LSC/2024/0033 · service charges · Worthing · decided 15 Nov 2024
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal found the service charge demands for the years ending 2024 and 2025 payable, as the leaseholders identified no specific cost headings they could substantiate as unreasonable, and it made an order under section 20C so the landlord cannot add its costs of the proceedings to the service charge.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, other, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
the payability of service charges for the years ending 2023-24
- outcome
Accordingly, the Tribunal determines that the demands for the years ending 2024 and 2025 are payable.
- s20c
the Tribunal will make an order under s.20C restricting the Respondent from recovering the cost of these proceedings from
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.