18 Rochester House, Manciple Street, London SE1 4LP
· other · Southwark · decided 19 Nov 2019
The tribunal found the first major works service charges were demanded in accordance with the lease and the disputed costs were reasonably incurred and recoverable, with consultation requirements complied with, while the section 20C application was deferred for later decision.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 42 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2010, 2011, 2012, 2016, 2017 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, major works, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £12,884.88 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 42 flats in Rochester House and 38 in Harbledown House.
- years
in respect of the years 2010/2011, 2011/2012, 2012/2013, 2016/2017 and 2017/2018.
- outcome
The disputed itemised costs incurred in the first major works were reasonably incurred and were recoverable under the terms of the lease.
- total demanded
Ultimately [name] demanded £12,884.88 from Mr [name] in respect of the first major works project
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.