Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near CR7 7PP

18 Langdale Road Thornton Heath Surrey CR7 7PP

LON/00AH/LCP/2019/0006 · LCP · Croydon · decided 18 Jun 2019

The Tribunal refused the applicant's request for a rule 13 costs order against the RTM company, but ordered the RTM company to pay the landlord £2,512.20 in reasonable costs arising from the claim notices under section 88(4) of the 2002 Act.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordAssethold Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block · 2 decisions about this building
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputelegal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducedlegal and professional fees
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payable£2,512.20
Fees or costs orderedthe respondent to pay the applicant costs of £2,512.20 under section 88(4) of the 2002 Act

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

outcome
The Tribunal determines the Respondent shall pay the Applicant costs in the sum of £2,512.20 pursuant to section 88(4)
total payable
the Respondent shall pay the Applicant costs in the sum of £2,512.20
costs
the Respondent shall pay the Applicant costs in the sum of £2,512.20

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.