18 Chasefield Close, Guildford, Surrey GU4 7YR
CHI/43UD/LBC/2019/0021 · breach of lease · Guildford · decided 22 Jan 2020
The Tribunal dismissed the landlord's application that the leaseholder had breached lease covenants on clauses 4.8 and 4.13 by his conduct, finding the alleged incidents were not proven or did not amount to a breach.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The Tribunal decides that Mr [name] has not breached the covenants at clauses 4.8 and 4.13 of the lease, and that the Application should be dismissed.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.