Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near DA12 2BT

17B Milton Place & The Vault, Gravesend, Kent, DA12 2BT

CHI/29UG/LSC/2018/0093 · service charges · Gravesham · decided 7 May 2019

The tribunal reduced the landlord's insurance premiums for 2013 to 2018 to the amounts set out in the decision, made an order under section 20C limiting the landlord's costs being added to the service charge, and limited administration charges to £500 inclusive of VAT, while rejecting the claim that the Vault is exempt from service charges.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordFairfield Rents Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat, 4 flats
Service charge years in dispute2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018
Items in disputeinsurance
Items disallowed or reducedinsurance
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
currently divided into four apartments
freeholder
Respondent : Fairfield Rents Ltd
years
insurance premiums for service charge years 2013 to 2018 inclusive
outcome
resulting in a 54% reduction and a premium payable of £1,638
items reduced
resulting in a 54% reduction and a premium payable of £1,638
s20c
The Tribunal makes Orders under s20C Landlord and

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.