171 Tower Bridge Road, London SE1 2AW
LON/00BE/LSC/2019/0021 · service charges · Southwark · decided 20 Jan 2020
The tribunal found the RTM company was not entitled to acquire the right to manage because the notice of invitation to participate and claim notice were not validly served on a non-participating leaseholder, and the application was dismissed.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | 171 Tower Bridge Road RTM Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Limited
- management company
171 Tower Bridge Road RTM Company Ltd
- outcome
I determine that the applicant was not on the relevant date entitled to acquire the Right to Manage the premises pursuant to section 84(5)(a) of the Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.