17 Vauxhall Grove, Walker Street, Hull, HU3 2QY
MAN/00FA/LSC/2019/0010 · service charges · Kingston upon Hull, City of · decided 29 Nov 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found that all the service charges for 2016 to 2019 for this bungalow are chargeable under the lease and at a reasonable level, and made a paragraph 5A order so the costs of the case cannot be charged to the applicant alone.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
three service charge years, 2016 to 2017, 2017 to 2018 and 2018 to 2019
- outcome
the service charges placed in issue in this case are all chargeable under the terms of the lease
- s20c
It would be unjust and unfair to the Respondent to make such an order.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.