17 Maristow Street, Westbury, Wilts BA13 3DN
CHI/00HY/LIS/2020/0018 · LIS · Wiltshire · decided 28 Sep 2020
The tribunal held that the lease's fixed-service-charge clause 6.8 is void, found the 2019 roof demand of £5935.20 payable following a valid consultation, and found the administration charges not payable.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | City Freeholds Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | £5,935.20 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the main structure and exterior of the building (which comprises two flats)
- freeholder
Applicant : City Freeholds Limited
- years
In service charge year 2018 the Applicant seeks a determination that the Respondent owes service charges of £29.96.
- outcome
The Tribunal does not find that any of these administration charges are payable.
- items reduced
Accordingly the Tribunal does not find that any of these administration charges are payable.
- total demanded
the Respondent should pay a demand for £5935.20 in respect of anticipated roof repair costs.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.