Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BS1 6FH

17 Garamond Court, Somerset Street, Redcliffe, Bristol BS1 6FH

CHI/00HB/LSC/2023/0164 · service charges · Bristol, City of · decided 27 Sep 2024

The tribunal found the leaseholder must pay £1307.28 towards the replacement of the block's intercom system for 2023, as the lease covers it under the landlord's repair duties, and refused the cost-protection and fee-refund requests.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordLivewest Homes Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat, 30 flats
Service charge years in dispute2023
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payable£1,307.28
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
a purpose-built block of 30 flats
freeholder
Respondent : Livewest Homes Ltd
years
the service charge year 2023
outcome
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £1307.28 is payable by the Applicant in respect of the service charges for the year 2023.
total payable
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £1307.28 is payable by the Applicant in respect of the service charges for the year 2023.
s20c
The Tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.