Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near LA14 2TX

16a-16h Egerton Court, Barrow-In-Furness LA14 2TX

MAN/16UC/LDC/2025/0681 · dispensation from consultation · Westmorland and Furness · decided 9 Mar 2026

The Tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for fire-stopping and sealing an under-stair void in the common parts of Egerton Court, finding no relevant prejudice to leaseholders.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordRockwell (FC101) Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 8 flats
Service charge years in dispute2012
Items in disputenot stated
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
comprising 8 self-contained residential apartments arranged over
freeholder
Applicant : [name] (FC101) Limited
outcome
the Tribunal makes a determination to dispense with the requirement to consult with the Respondents on
s20
the Tribunal makes a determination under section 20ZA of the Act to dispense with the requirement to consult with the Respondents under section 20 in relation to the Works.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.