168 Olivia Court, Asgard Drive, Salford, M5 4TR
MAN/00BR/LSC/2022/0050 · service charges · Salford · decided 6 Mar 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal struck out the leaseholder's service charge application because the issues raised about spending priorities and communication fall outside its jurisdiction, and ordered the applicant to pay the respondent £6170 plus VAT in costs.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 170 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | applicant to pay respondent £6170 plus £1234 VAT in costs |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
to manage the building comprising 170 flats
- freeholder
Respondent: [name] Park (Salford) RTM Company Ltd
- years
payability of service charges for the years 2017/18
- outcome
is struck out under Rule 9(2)(a) and 9(3)(e)
- s20c
the Tribunal declines to make such an order.
- costs
The Applicant is to pay the sum of £6170 plus £1234 VAT in costs to
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.