167A Teviot Street, London E14 6PY
LON/00BG/LSC/2020/0220 · service charges · Tower Hamlets · decided 23 Aug 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the tenant in breach of lease clauses 3(7) and 3(8), held section 20B did not bar the charges, limited two 2012-13 Asphatic roof invoices to £250 each because consultation was not carried out, found the other charges payable, and refused a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Community Association Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2012, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
in respect of the service charge years 2012-13 to 2018-19
- outcome
The tribunal determines that the amount payable in respect of the invoices to Asphatic Limited in 2012 – 13 should each be limited to £250.
- items reduced
The tribunal determines that the amount payable in respect of the invoices to Asphatic Limited in 2012 – 13 should each be limited to £250.
- s20c
The tribunal determines not to make such an order.
- s20
The landlord had no records of having carried out consultation.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.