167-173 Sussex Gardens, London, W2 2RH
LON/00BK/LDC/2021/0311 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 14 Mar 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs and scaffolding at 167-173 Sussex Gardens, on terms that the cost of the application cannot be charged to tenants through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Wellcome Trust Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Savills (UK) Limited |
| Building | A block, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £7,380 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the costs of this application are not to be regarded as relevant costs in determining the service charge payable by the |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
now comprising 14 flats over 5
- freeholder
Applicant The Wellcome Trust Limited
- agent
Manager, Savills (UK) Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the consultation requirements in relation to roof repairs at 167-173 Sussex Gardens, London W2 (including the erecting and dismantling of a scaffolding tower) be dispensed with
- total demanded
The total costs incurred in relation to the repairs and the erection and dismantling of a scaffolding tower were £7,380 inclusive of VAT.
- s20
I therefore dispense with the consultation requirements in relation to these works
- costs
on terms that the costs incurred in relation to this application for dispensation shall not be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge payable by the tenants
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.