163B Prince of Wales Road, London NW5 3PY
LON/00AG/LSC/2025/0927 · service charges · Camden · decided 27 Oct 2025
The tribunal found the contested service charge demands payable, holding that the respondent could demand service charges during the registration gap and that the address notices were valid, and declined to order reimbursement of fees.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to bear no reimbursement; respondent not ordered to reimburse application and hearing fees |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
from the freeholder, Millcastle Properties Limited
- years
in respect of the service charge years from 2019 to 2024
- outcome
The Tribunal finds that the contested service charge demands were payable.
- costs
we conclude that we should not make the order. The Respondent has been wholly successful.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.