163 Trinity Road, London SW17 7HL
LON/00BJ/LDC/2021/0114 · dispensation from consultation · Wandsworth · decided 2 Aug 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent replacement of the bin store at 163 Trinity Road, but made no finding on whether the cost is reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Wellcome Trust Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Savills (UK) Limited |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Applicant, The Wellcome Trust Limited, is the freeholder and landlord in respect of 6 flats at 163 Trinity Road
- freeholder
The Applicant, The Wellcome Trust Limited, is the freeholder and landlord in respect of 6 flats
- agent
The Applicant acts through its managing agents [name] (UK) Limited of 33 Margaret Street
- outcome
(1) Dispensation is granted pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.
- s20
Dispensation is granted pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.