Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near NE42 5ET

16 The Manors, Adderlane Road, Prudhoe, NE42 5ET

MAN/00EM/LSC/2019/0023 · service charges · Northumberland · decided 23 Sep 2019

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the increased monthly service charge of £481.46 from April 2019, which reflects a higher warden service cost after the service was extended to 24-hour cover, reasonable and payable, and made no costs order.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordKarbon Homes Ltd.
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2019
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payable£481.46
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : Karbon Homes Ltd.
years
the total amount to be paid by the applicant for the year 2019/20 is £481.46
outcome
The amount claimed by the respondent is reasonable in amount and properly incurred.
total payable
the total amount to be paid by the applicant for the year 2019/20 is £481.46
s20c
Therefore, we do not make an order under s.20(C) of the 1987 Act

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.