16 Egerton Gardens London SW3 2DG
LON/00AW/LDC/2020/0129 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 24 Nov 2020
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for an urgent £2220 repair to a loose downpipe at the building.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Wellcome Trust Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Savills (UK) Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 7 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £2,220 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into seven flats
- freeholder
Applicant : The Wellcome Trust Limited
- agent
Representative : [name] (UK) Ltd
- outcome
The application for dispensation from the consultation requirements under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the invoice set out in Paragraph 2 below is GRANTED.
- total demanded
11 August 2020 Foxley’s Fabric & £2220
- s20
The application for dispensation from the consultation requirements under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the invoice set out in Paragraph 2 below is GRANTED.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.