16 & 24 Lime Grove, Yardley, Birmingham, B26 1BP
BIR/00CN/LDC/2023/0029 · dispensation from consultation · Birmingham · decided 13 Feb 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord's application to dispense with the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent replacement of street lighting on the private road at Lime Grove.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Cygnet Property Management PLC |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Midland Heart Ltd |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are twelve leasehold flats and eight separate houses (so 20 properties) served by the private road.
- agent
The Applicant (through its agent, Midland Heart Ltd) has applied
- outcome
The Applicant may dispense with the consultation requirements contained in section 20 of the Act in respect of the carrying out of the Works.
- s20
We determine that the Application is granted. The Applicant may dispense with the consultation requirements contained in section 20 of the Act in respect of the carrying out of the Works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.