16-45 Newbury House, Overton Road, London, SW9 7HJ
LON/00AY/LDC/2021/0263 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 14 Jan 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for replacing a leaking communal cold water tank at Newbury House.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 30 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
purpose built block of 30 flats of which 9 are respondents
- outcome
Dispensation in respect of consultation requirements in respect of replacing a leaking communal cold water tank and associated works set out in a Lambeth Justification Report dated 29.10.2020 is GRANTED unconditionally.
- s20
the appropriate outcome under section 20ZA is that dispensation is granted unconditionally in respect of the consultation requirements for these works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.