16-20 North Street, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8DL
CHI/00HG/LDC/2020/0098 · dispensation from consultation · Plymouth · decided 29 Dec 2020
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for replacing the fire alarm system, and refused an order preventing the landlord recovering its costs of the application through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Q Dime Limited |
| Management company | Sixteen Management Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
(1) Q Dime Limited
- management company
Applicant : Sixteen Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal, therefore, dispenses with the consultation requirements in respect of the replacement of the fire alarm system.
- s20
The Tribunal, therefore, dispenses with the consultation requirements in respect of the replacement of the fire alarm system.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.