159-167 Prince of Wales Road, London NW5 3PY
LON/00AG/LCP/2022/0011 · LCP · Camden · decided 12 Jan 2023
The tribunal refused Assethold Limited's application for costs under section 88 of the 2002 Act because Assethold had no legal interest in the property when the RTM claim notice was served, so the RTM company must pay no costs and the fee reimbursement was refused.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £14,747.22 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to bear the respondent's position; the application for reimbursement of the tribunal fee is refused |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
A. No costs are payable by the respondent to the applicant under section 88(1) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2022
- total demanded
The total sum claimed is £14,747.22
- costs
B. The application for reimbursement of the Tribunal fee is refused.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.