Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near NW6 2RB

159-161 Iverson Road, London NW6 2RB

LON/00AG/LDC/2023/0206 · dispensation from consultation · Camden · decided 20 Nov 2023

The tribunal granted the RTM company dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs costing £18,075.94 at the block.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedRTM company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentPrime Property Management
BuildingA block, 20 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£18,075.94
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The Property comprises a block containing 20 apartments.
agent
Representative : Prime Property Management
outcome
The tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from consultation, pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
total demanded
These were started on 7 July 2023 and completed on 16 July at a total cost of £18,075.94.
s20
The tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from consultation, pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, in respect of works of repair

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.