153C Mitcham Lane, London SW16 6NA
LON/00BJ/LSC/2023/0006 · service charges · Wandsworth · decided 10 May 2023
The tribunal decided that the leaseholder must pay only £30 plus VAT per notice under the lease for notices such as remortgage, sublet and tenancy grants, not the £150 demanded, and made an order that the landlord's costs of the tribunal proceedings cannot be passed through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | £150 |
| Total found payable | £30 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a converted house comprising three flats
- freeholder
Assethold Limited
- years
the service charge year 2022
- outcome
The tribunal determines that the sum of £30 plus VAT only is payable by the Applicant in respect of each notice
- items reduced
Whether the Applicant was obliged to pay the sum of £150
- total demanded
Whether the Applicant was obliged to pay the sum of £150 (this being the sum demanded) for registration of notice to sublet in 2022.
- s20c
The tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.