15 Rollings House, Wrights Meadow Road, High Wycombe, HP11 1NQ
CAM/11UF/LSC/2019/0040 · service charges · Buckinghamshire · decided 11 Nov 2019
The tribunal struck out the parts of the application covered by the earlier County Court judgment and the window cleaning and signature points, and for January to July 2018 it found the charges reasonable and payable except that the insurance valuation split was reduced to 23.5%, and it refused the landlord-cost protection application.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Reeve LLP |
| Management company | St. James Gate (High Wycombe) Residents Co. Limited |
| Managing agent | Hallmark Property Management Limited |
| Building | One flat, 15 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Rollings House consists of 15 flats
- management company
Respondent : [name]. [name] Gate ([name])
- agent
[name] of Hallmark Property Management Limited
- years
in respect of the service charges for the period 1st January 2018 to 31st July 2018
- outcome
rather the Tribunal finds that 23.5% is the proportion reasonable and payable by blocks D1 and D2
- items reduced
we substitute £1157.54 for £1987.20
- s20c
the Application for an order made pursuant to section 20C of the 1985 Act is refused.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.