15 Mark Street, Liverpool L5 0RF

MAN/00BY/LSC/2023/0074 · service charges · Liverpool · decided 7 May 2025

figures not yet checked

The tribunal held that the previous leaseholder's sinking fund debt of £6,031.57 is not payable by the applicant, that sinking fund contributions of £3,686.95 for 2016/17 to 2023/24 are payable, and that the respondent must refund the £325 tribunal fee.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Torus 62 Limited
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	A block, 9 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2016, 2017
Items in dispute	reserve fund
Items disallowed or reduced	reserve fund
Total demanded	£6,031.57
Total found payable	£3,686.95
Fees or costs ordered	respondent to refund the applicant's £325 tribunal fee; litigation costs extinguished

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: purpose built block of flats with nine units
freeholder: Torus 62 Limited
years: the sinking fund contributions for the years 2016/17 to 23/24 of £3686.95 are payable
outcome: The Respondent has conceded that the previous Leaseholder's Sinking Fund debt liability of £6031.57 is not payable by the Applicant.
items reduced: The Respondent has conceded that the previous Leaseholder's Sinking Fund debt liability of £6031.57 is not payable by the Applicant.
total demanded: In his application dated 13 September 2024 he stated that the value of the dispute was £6031.57.
total payable: (1) The sinking fund contributions for the years 2016/17 to 23/24 of £3686.95 are payable.
s20c: It also extinguishes any litigation costs that may be claimed.
costs: the Tribunal orders the Respondent to refund the £325 fees paid by the Applicant

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.