15 Clifton Gardens, Clifton Road, Southampton, Hampshire SO15 4GX
CHI/00MS/LBC/2018/0025 · breach of lease · Southampton · decided 23 Jan 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the tenant in breach of the repair covenant for the overflow pipe and found most of the service charges and fees payable, but two deficit sums of £9.80 and £99.54 were not payable.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Buildinvest Limited |
| Management company | Clifton Gardens Management Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees, other, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Buildinvest Limited (the Landlord)
- management company
Clifton Gardens Management Limited (2)
- years
the Applicant seeks a determination of certain service charge items in the years 2015-2018
- outcome
the Tribunal determines that it is not payable.
- items reduced
the Tribunal determines that it is not payable.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.