15 Chapel Market London N1 9EZ
LON/00AU/LDC/2024/0618 · dispensation from consultation · Islington · decided 17 Dec 2024
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for structural repairs to two chimney stacks and any ancillary roof works at the building, finding the leaseholders had not shown they were prejudiced by the failure to consult.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
and four flats; one on the ground and lower ground floor
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for retrospective dispensation from the
- s20
while the freeholder did not formally comply with the s.20 consultation requirements in respect of the chimney stack works
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.