15 Cavendish House, Tudor Court, Bramshott Place Village, Liphook, GU30 7GL
HAV/24UC/LSC/2025/0731 · service charges · East Hampshire · decided 29 Apr 2026
The tribunal dismissed the leaseholders' challenge to £114,636.18 of planned maintenance charges paid to Cambridge for 2017/18, finding the services were provided, and refused a section 20C order while extinguishing one litigation-cost administration charge.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Senior Living (Bramshott Place) Ltd |
| Management company | Bramshott Place Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Savills (UK) Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £114,636.18 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
[name] (Bramshott Place) Ltd
- agent
Savills (UK) Limited (Savills) the managing agent which managed the property during the 2018 SC year
- years
the service charge year April 2017 to 31 March 2018
- outcome
The Applicant’s claim is dismissed.
- total demanded
the maintenance charges in four invoices totalling £114,636.18
- s20c
The Tribunal declines to make an order under Section 20C of the Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.