Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near GU30 7GL

15 Cavendish House, Tudor Court, Bramshott Place Village, Liphook, GU30 7GL

HAV/24UC/LSC/2025/0731 · service charges · East Hampshire · decided 29 Apr 2026

The tribunal dismissed the leaseholders' challenge to £114,636.18 of planned maintenance charges paid to Cambridge for 2017/18, finding the services were provided, and refused a section 20C order while extinguishing one litigation-cost administration charge.

OutcomeDismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordSenior Living (Bramshott Place) Ltd
Management companyBramshott Place Management Company Limited
Managing agentSavills (UK) Limited
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2017
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£114,636.18
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
[name] (Bramshott Place) Ltd
agent
Savills (UK) Limited (Savills) the managing agent which managed the property during the 2018 SC year
years
the service charge year April 2017 to 31 March 2018
outcome
The Applicant’s claim is dismissed.
total demanded
the maintenance charges in four invoices totalling £114,636.18
s20c
The Tribunal declines to make an order under Section 20C of the Act.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.