Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near HP9 1QQ

14A The Highway, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, HP9 1QQ

CAM/11UE/OLR/2018/0206 · OLR · Buckinghamshire · decided 14 Jan 2019

figures not yet checked

The tribunal set the reasonable legal costs payable by the leaseholder on a lease extension at £1,189.39 and the valuation fee at £650.00, and refused the landlord's application for costs under rule 13.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordTemptation (Gifts) Ltd.
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputelegal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducedlegal and professional fees
Total demanded£3,308
Total found payable£1,189.39
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : [name] (Gifts) Ltd. (named as
outcome
The reasonable legal costs of the Respondent payable by the Applicant pursuant to Section 60 of the 1993 Act are £1,189.39.
total demanded
3,350.00 1,189.39
total payable
The reasonable legal costs of the Respondent payable by the Applicant pursuant to Section 60 of the 1993 Act are £1,189.39.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.