140 Cavendish Road, Clapham South, London, SW12 00D
LON/00AG/LDC/2024/0105 · dispensation from consultation · Camden · decided 18 Jun 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent balcony repair works already carried out to stop ongoing damp, so the works can proceed without prior consultation; it did not decide whether the charges are payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Southern Land Securities Ltd
- agent
Representative : Together Property Management
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements provided for by section 20
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements provided for by section 20
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.