14 Harlow Court, Wray Common Road, Reigate RH2 0RJ
CHI/43UF/LSC/2020/0087 · service charges · Reigate and Banstead · decided 1 Jun 2021
The tribunal found the March 2020 on account demand of £784.50 was reasonable except that £2,590 of unspent 2019/20 surplus should have been credited, so the payable amount was set at £712.55.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Harlow Court Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | PMMS Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 18 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees, management fees, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £784.50 |
| Total found payable | £712.55 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
being one of 18 flats at Harlow Court
- freeholder
Respondent : Harlow Court Limited
- agent
[name] of PMMS Ltd, the managing agents.
- years
Thus the only substantive issue remaining in dispute is the first on account demand made in service charge year 2020/21
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the reasonable amount payable by the Applicant in respect of the March 2020 on account demand should have been £712.55
- total demanded
a revised demand was issued dated 23 March 2020 in the sum of £784.50.
- total payable
should have been £712.55 instead of £784.50.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.