14 Chipstead Road, Birmingham, B23 5HA
BIR/00CN/LBC/2022/0002 · breach of lease · Birmingham · decided 6 Jan 2023
The Tribunal determined that the leaseholders breached clause 3(b) of the lease by building the rear extension without the landlord's written approval, and breached clause 3(g) by failing to serve notice of a mortgage, but found no breach of the single-family use restriction.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that a breach of the following covenants in the Lease to the Property have occurred
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.