14-18 (evens) & 29-45 (odds) Guinea Hall Close and 18-28 Guinea Hall Mews, Southport PR9 8RG
MAN/30UP/LDC/2022/0060 · dispensation from consultation · West Lancashire · decided 10 May 2023
The tribunal retrospectively dispensed with the section 20 consultation requirements for the complete re-roofing of block 18-28 Guinea Hall Mews, because the roof was leaking and urgent work was needed.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Guinea Hall Farm Management Company Ltd |
| Management company | Guinea Hall Farm Management Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | Guinea Hall Farm Management Company Limited |
| Building | An estate, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Applicant is the management company for the Property.
- outcome
Compliance with the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dispensed with in relation to works
- s20
Compliance with the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dispensed with in relation to works
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.