138 Teesdale Street, London E2 6PU
LON/00BG/LSC/2024/0655 · service charges · Tower Hamlets · decided 9 Dec 2025
The tribunal found the sums challenged by the first applicant for building insurance, management, audit, cleaning, caretaking, communal repairs, estate security and bulk rubbish removal payable, and made no order under section 20C; the second applicants' application was withdrawn after settlement.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
in respect of the service charge years 2010 to 2025 and 2025/26 (estimated)
- outcome
all sums challenged as detailed in the paragraphs below, are reasonable and payable by the first applicant to the respondent.
- s20c
The tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.