136 Harley Street, London, W1G 7JZ
LON/00BK/LSC/2025/0684 · service charges · Westminster · decided 17 Nov 2025
The tribunal made no deduction for the disputed lift call-out charges, which it found reasonable, but the landlord agreed to reduce the monthly cleaning charge by £50 for April 2022 to July 2023, with the leaseholders' figures to be recalculated accordingly.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Howard de Walden Estates Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicants : [name] de Walden Estates Ltd
- years
the years ending (YE) March 2022 and March 2023
- outcome
offering to reduce the amount charged for cleaning from £399.55 per month
- items reduced
offering to reduce the amount charged for cleaning from £399.55 per month
- s20c
the Respondents made no application under section 20 C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in any event
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.