135 Wood Lane,London,W12 7ED
LON/00AN/LSC/2023/0452 · service charges · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 3 Mar 2025
The tribunal found the disputed repairs and maintenance, caretaking and horticulture charges for 2020/2021 to 2023/2024 reasonable and payable, refused the leaseholder's set-off claims, and refused her requests for a section 20C order and reimbursement of tribunal fees.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
the periods 2020/2021, 2021/2022, 2022/2023, and 2023/2024
- outcome
We find the cost of caretaking amounting to £214.56 was reasonably incurred
- s20c
The Tribunal refuses the Applicant’s request for orders under section 20C of the 1985 Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.